1.2.2 Appeal 139-2019 (lead)
Appeal No.
|
Roll No.
|
Civic Address
|
139-2019 (lead)
|
405304050
|
3810 Arthur Rose Ave
|
48-2019
|
405305100
|
3924 Brodsky Ave
|
132-2019
|
415303200
|
126 Wheeler St
|
Appearing for the Appellant
Mr. Jesse Faith, Altus Group Limited
Appearing for the Respondent
Mr. Travis Horne, Revaluation and Assessment Appeal Coordinator, Assessment & Valuation
Grounds and Issues
The grounds and issues for this appeal as identified in the Notice of Appeal (Exhibit A.1) are as follows:
Ground 1: The Assessor erred in the calculation of the property assessment when applying the current capitalization rate.
Ground 2: The Assessor has failed to achieve the market valuation standard.
Ground 3: The Assessor has failed to maintain equity when determining the current assessment of the subject property.
Ground 4: The Assessor has failed to apply the findings of SMB decision AAC 2017-0225 in determining the current assessment.
Ground 5: The estimated net operating income is in error.
Exhibits
A.1 Notice of Appeal from Altus Group to the Board of Revision, received February 4, 2019.
A.2 COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s submission to the Board of Revision, (Acklands-Granger Inc. Et Al), received April 30, 2019 (Note: Document includes Appendix A to V and Addenda 1 to 5). (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).
A.3 Document A.3 was not submitted for this file.
A.4 Document A.4 was not submitted for this file.
A.5 COMMON DOCUMENT – Appellant’s submission to the Board of Revision, (Conax Properties Ltd. Et Al) received April 30, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 139, 48, 132, 164)
A.6 COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s rebuttal document to the Board of Revision, (Acklands-Granger Inc. Et Al), received May 15, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).
A.7 COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s submission titled “Expert Will Say Statement & Curriculum Vitae” submitted to the Board of Revision, received May 15, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).
B.1 Document B.1 was not submitted for this file.
R.1 COMMON DOCUMENT – submitted by the City Assessor titled “Warehouse & Automotive Response 2019 Assessment”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.2 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 General Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.3 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Expert Witness Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.4 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Notice of Appeal Law and Legislation brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.5 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Response Evidence Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.6 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “Salient Facts & Field Sheets”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 80, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 115, 118, 122, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 144, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185)
Supplementary Notations
The Chair reminded the parties that they were still under oath from the initial hearing which commenced on May 21, 2019.
At the request of the Respondent, and pursuant to Section 208 of The Cities Act, the Chair ordered that the hearing be recorded by Royal Reporting Services.
The Agent and the Respondent agreed that Appeal 139-2019 would be heard first and that all evidence and argument from that appeal would be carried forward into appeals 132-2019 and 48-2019.
The Agent and Respondent agreed that the evidence and argument from Appeal 36-2019 be carried forward into the record of this appeal as it pertains to the cap rate ground of appeal.
Conclusion
For the reasons given in the Record of Decision dated August 30, 2019, and in accordance with Section 210(1) (b) of The Cities Act, the Board changes the assessment and directs a revision of the assessment roll for all properties under appeal. The resultant change in assessment will reflect a revised stratification to include (with the exception of the current Group 6) all warehouses under appeal city wide >24,000 sq. ft. and having a site coverage greater than 17%. The new Market Cap Rate arising from this stratification will be applied to the determination of the new assessed value of the subject properties.
The Current Assessed Values are reduced. The assessments are ADJUSTED and all other aspects of the appeals are dismissed. The Appellant’s filing fees are refunded.
1.2.3 Appeal 75-2019 (lead)
Appeal No.
|
Roll No.
|
Civic Address
|
75-2019 (lead)
|
385010400
|
1327 North Service Rd
|
80-2019
|
495602940
|
325 Jessop Ave
|
122-2019
|
475011340
|
1201 Quebec Ave
|
Appearing for the Appellant
Mr. Jesse Faith, Altus Group Limited
Appearing for the Respondent
Mr. Travis Horne, Revaluation and Assessment Appeal Coordinator, Assessment & Valuation
Grounds and Issues
The grounds and issues for this appeal as identified in the Notice of Appeal (Exhibit A.1) are as follows:
- The assessor erred in not applying a MAF to the RNCLD lump sum adjustment.
Exhibits
A.1 Notice of Appeal from Altus Group to the Board of Revision, received February 4, 2019.
A.2 Document A.2 was not submitted for this file.
A.3 Document A.3 was not submitted for this file.
A.4 COMMON DOCUMENT – Appellant’s submission to the Board of Revision (Saskatoon Cooperative Association Et Al), received April 30, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 41, 46, 75, 122, 145, 140, 172, 161, 149, 158, 87, 154).
A.5 Document A.5 was not submitted for this file.
A.6 Document A.6 was not submitted for this file.
A.7 Document A.7 was not submitted for this file.
B.1 COMMON DOCUMENT – Email from Assessment & Valuation to Altus Group dated May 3, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 41, 46, 57, 75, 80, 87, 122, 135, 136, 145, 149, 140, 172, 161, 158, 154, 178)
R.1 COMMON DOCUMENT – submitted by the City Assessor titled “Warehouse & Automotive Response 2019 Assessment”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.2 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 General Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.3 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Expert Witness Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.4 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Notice of Appeal Law and Legislation brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.5 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Response Evidence Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.6 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “Salient Facts & Field Sheets”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 80, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 115, 118, 122, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 144, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185)
Supplementary Notations
The Chair reminded the parties that they were still under oath from the initial hearing which commenced on May 21, 2019.
At the request of the Respondent, and pursuant to Section 208 of The Cities Act, the Chair ordered that the hearing be recorded by Royal Reporting Services.
The Tax Agent advised the Panel that he would not speak to Grounds 1 & 2 of Appeal 122-2019.
The parties to the appeal agreed that Appeal No. 75-2019 would be heard first and that all evidence and argument from that appeal would be carried forward into the following appeals:
80-2019, 122-2019.
They further agreed that as per Exhibit B.1:
“The MAF issue is “stand up sit down”. This issue is before the A.A.C. and the evidence and argument in 2019 is the same as previous years.”
Conclusion
For the reasons stated in the Record of Decision dated August 30, 2019, and in accordance with Section 210(1) (a) of The Cities Act, the Board confirms the assessments. The appeals are dismissed.
1.2.4 Appeal 46-2019 (lead)
Appeal No.
|
Roll No.
|
Civic Address
|
46-2019
|
404907000
|
110 Marquis Dr
|
87-2019
|
404921050
|
535 71st St
|
129-2019
|
404904000
|
3935 Thatcher Ave
|
140-2019
|
424900500
|
3455 Idylwyld Dr
|
145-2019
|
415209050
|
3610 Kochar Ave
|
149-2019
|
395050050
|
1045 North Service Rd
|
154-2019
|
404910700
|
122 Wakooma St
|
158-2019
|
415122450
|
745 66th St
|
161-2019
|
385010200
|
1125 North Service Rd
|
172-2019
|
435100380
|
2945 Millar Ave
|
Appearing for the Appellant
Mr. Jesse Faith, Altus Group Limited
Appearing for the Respondent
Mr. Travis Horne, Revaluation and Assessment Appeal Coordinator, Assessment & Valuation
Grounds and Issues
The grounds and issues for this appeal as identified in the Notice of Appeal (Exhibit A.1) are as follows:
- The assessor erred in the calculation of the property assessment when applying the current capitalization (CAP) rate.
- The assessor has failed to achieve the market valuation standard.
- The assessor has failed to maintain equity when determining the current assessment of the subject property.
- The assessor has failed to apply the findings of SMB decision AAC 2017-0225 in determining the current assessment.
- The assessor has erred in not applying a MAF to the RCNLD lump sum adjustment.
Exhibits
A.1 Notice of Appeal from Altus Group to the Board of Revision, received February 4, 2019.
A.2 COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s submission to the Board of Revision, (Acklands-Granger Inc. Et Al), received April 30, 2019 (Note: Document includes Appendix A to V and Addenda 1 to 5). (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).
A.3 Document A.3 was not submitted for this file.
A.4 COMMON DOCUMENT – Appellant’s submission to the Board of Revision (Saskatoon Cooperative Association et al), received April 30, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 41, 46, 75, 87, 122, 140, 145, 149, 154, 158, 161, 172).
A.5 Document A.5 was not submitted for this file.
A.6 COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s rebuttal document to the Board of Revision, (Acklands-Granger Inc. Et Al), received May 15, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129,132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).
A.7 COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s submission titled “Expert Will Say Statement & Curriculum Vitae” submitted to the Board of Revision, received May 15, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).
B.1 COMMON DOCUMENT – Email from Assessment & Valuation to Altus Group dated May 3, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 41, 46, 57, 75, 80, 87,122, 135, 136, 140, 145, 149, 154, 158, 161, 172, 178).
R.1 COMMON DOCUMENT – submitted by the City Assessor titled “Warehouse & Automotive Response 2019 Assessment”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.2 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 General Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.3 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Expert Witness Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.4 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Notice of Appeal Law and Legislation brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.5 COMMON DOCUMENT – submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Response Evidence Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.6 COMMON DOCUMENT – submitted by the City Assessor titled “Salient Facts & Field Sheets”, received May 1, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 80, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 115, 118, 122, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 144, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).
Supplementary Notations
The Chair reminded the parties that they were still under oath from the initial hearing which commenced on May 21, 2019.
At the request of the Respondent, and pursuant to Section 208 of The Cities Act, the Chair ordered that the hearing be recorded by Royal Reporting Services.
The parties to the appeal agreed that:
- Grounds 1 to 4 (Section 2) would be addressed by bringing forward the record of BOR 36-2019 into this appeal; and
- Ground 5 (Section 2) would be addressed by bringing forward the record of BOR 75-2019 into this appeal.
- No additional testimony would be provided by either party.
Conclusion
For the reasons given in the Record of Decision dated August 30, 2019, and in accordance with Section 210(1) (b) of The Cities Act, the Board changes the assessment and directs a revision of the assessment roll for all properties under appeal. The resultant change in assessment will reflect a revised stratification to include (with the exception of the current Group 6) all warehouses under appeal city wide >24,000 sq. ft. and having a site coverage greater than 17%. The new Market Cap Rate arising from this stratification will be applied to the determination of the new assessed value of the subject properties.
The Current Assessed Values are reduced. The assessments are ADJUSTED and all other aspects of the appeals are dismissed. The Appellant’s filing fees are refunded.
1.2.5 Appeal 100-2019 (lead)
Appeal No.
|
Roll No.
|
Civic Address
|
100-2019
|
405310060
|
214 4014 Arthur Rose Ave
|
044-2019
|
405305350
|
4015 Brodsky Ave
|
096-2019
|
405309510
|
102 4002 Arthur Rose Ave
|
097-2019
|
405309515
|
104 4002 Arthur Rose Ave
|
098-2019
|
405309525
|
108 4002 Arthur Rose Ave
|
099-2019
|
405310095
|
200 4014 Arthur Rose Ave
|
101-2019
|
405310055
|
216 4014 Arthur Rose Ave
|
164-2019
|
405311540
|
10 3935 Arthur Rose Ave
|
Appearing for the Appellant
Mr. Jesse Faith, Altus Group Limited
Appearing for the Respondent
Mr. Travis Horne, Revaluation and Assessment Appeal Coordinator, Assessment & Valuation
Grounds and Issues
Ground 1: The estimated net operating income is in error
a) The current model rental rate is not reflective of the market value.
b) The current rental rate does not account for the impact due to the restrictive zoning associated with the property.
Exhibits
A.1 Notice of Appeal from Altus Group to the Board of Revision, received February 4, 2019.
A.2 COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s submission to the Board of Revision, (Acklands-Granger Inc. Et Al), received April 30, 2019 (Note: Document includes Appendix A to V and Addenda 1 to 5). (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).
A.3 Document A.3 was not submitted for this file.
A.4 Document A.4 was not submitted for this file.
A.5 COMMON DOCUMENT – Appellant’s submission to the Board of Revision, (Conax Properties Ltd. Et Al) received April 30, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 139, 48, 132, 164)
A.6 COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s rebuttal document to the Board of Revision, (Acklands-Granger Inc. Et Al), received May 15, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).
A.7 COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s submission titled “Expert Will Say Statement & Curriculum Vitae” submitted to the Board of Revision, received May 15, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).
B.1 Document B.1 was not submitted for this file.
R.1 COMMON DOCUMENT – submitted by the City Assessor titled “Warehouse & Automotive Response 2019 Assessment”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.2 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 General Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.3 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Expert Witness Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.4 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Notice of Appeal Law and Legislation brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.5 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Response Evidence Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.6 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “Salient Facts & Field Sheets”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 80, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 115, 118, 122, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 144, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185)
Supplementary Notations
The Chair reminded the parties that they were still under oath from the initial hearing which commenced on May 21, 2019.
At the request of the Respondent, and pursuant to Section 208 of The Cities Act, the Chair ordered that the hearing be recorded by Royal Reporting Services.
The Agent and the Respondent agreed that Appeal 139-2019 would be heard first and that all evidence and argument pertaining to the zoning ground, would be carried forward into appeals 100-2019, 101-2019, 164-2019, 44-2019, 96-2019, 97-2019, 98-2019, and 99-2019.
Conclusion
For the reasons given in the Record of Decision dated August 30, 2019, and in accordance with Section 210(1)(a) of The Cities Act, the Board confirms the assessments. The appeals are dismissed.
1.2.6 Appeal 136-2019
Appeal No.
|
Roll No.
|
Civic Address
|
136-2019
|
405300700
|
3927 Wanuskewin Road
|
Appearing for the Appellant
Mr. Jesse Faith, Altus Group Limited
Appearing for the Respondent
Mr. Travis Horne, Revaluation and Assessment Appeal Coordinator, Assessment & Valuation
Grounds and Issues
The grounds and issues for this appeal as identified in the Notice of Appeal (Exhibit A.1) are as follows:
- The assessor erred in the calculation of the property assessment when applying the current capitalization (CAP) rate.
- The assessor has failed to achieve the market valuation standard.
- The assessor has failed to maintain equity when determining the current assessment of the subject property.
- The assessor has failed to apply the findings of SMB decision AAC 2017-0225 in determining the current assessment.
- The estimated net operating income is in error.
Exhibits
A.1 Notice of Appeal from Altus Group to the Board of Revision, received February 4, 2019.
A.2 Document A.2 was not submitted for this file.
A.3 Document A.3 was not submitted for this file.
A.4 Document A.4 was not submitted for this file.
A.5 Document A.5 was not submitted for this file.
A.6 Document A.6 was not submitted for this file.
A.7 Document A.7 was not submitted for this file.
B.1 COMMON DOCUMENT – Email from Assessment & Valuation to Altus Group dated May 3, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 41, 46, 57, 75, 80, 87, 122, 135, 136, 145, 149, 140, 172, 161, 158, 154, 178)
R.1 COMMON DOCUMENT – submitted by the City Assessor titled “Warehouse & Automotive Response 2019 Assessment”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.2 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 General Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.3 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Expert Witness Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 8, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.4 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Notice of Appeal Law and Legislation brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.5 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Response Evidence Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.6 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “Salient Facts & Field Sheets”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 80, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 115, 118, 122, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 144, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185)
Supplementary Notations
The Chair reminded the parties that they were still under oath from the initial hearing which commenced on May 21, 2019.
At the request of the Respondent, and pursuant to Section 208 of The Cities Act, the Chair ordered that the hearing be recorded by Royal Reporting Services.
The parties to the appeal agreed that:
- With regard to Grounds 1 to 4, all evidence and argument from appeal BOR 36-2019 would be carried forward into this appeal.
- With regard to Ground 5, the Panel would take direction from the outcome of appeal BOR 13&14-2019 in which the same ground was appealed for the subject property, but through a different Tax Agent. (subject property’s appeal being 13-2019)
Conclusion
For the reasons given in the Record of Decision dated August 30, 2019, and in accordance with Section 210(1) (b) of The Cities Act, the Board changes the assessment and directs a revision of the assessment roll for the property under appeal. The resultant change in assessment will reflect the revised warehouse stratification (determined in BOR 36-2019) to include (with the exception of the current Group 6) all warehouses under appeal city wide >24,000 sq. ft. and having a site coverage greater than 17%. The new Market Cap Rate arising from this stratification will be applied to the determination of the new assessed value of the subject property.
Additionally, the subject property’s assessed value will be further adjusted in compliance with the Board’s order in BOR 13-2019 regarding a rental rate reduction of 18%.
The Current Assessed Value is reduced. The assessment is adjusted and all other aspects of the appeal dismissed.
1.2.7 Appeal 057-2019
Appeal No.
|
Roll No.
|
Civic Address
|
057-2019
|
435007100
|
2907/2915 Faithfull Avenue
|
Appearing for the Appellant
Mr. Jesse Faith, Altus Group Limited
Appearing for the Respondent
Mr. Travis Horne, Revaluation and Assessment Appeal Coordinator, Assessment & Valuation
Grounds and Issues
The grounds and issues for this appeal as identified in the Notice of Appeal (Exhibit A.1) are as follows:
- The assessor erred in the calculation of the property assessment when applying the current capitalization (CAP) rate.
- The assessor has failed to achieve the market valuation standard.
- The assessor has failed to maintain equity when determining the current assessment of the subject property.
- The assessor has failed to apply the findings of SMB decision AAC 2017-0225 in determining the current assessment.
- The estimated net operating income is in error.
Exhibits
A.1 Notice of Appeal from Altus Group to the Board of Revision, received February 4, 2019.
A.2 COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s submission to the Board of Revision, (Acklands-Granger Inc. Et Al), received April 30, 2019 (Note: Document includes Appendix A to V and Addenda 1 to 5). (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).
A.3 Appellant’s submission to the Board of Revision, (Concorde Group of Companies), received April 30, 2019. (exclusive to 57-2019)
A.4 Document A.4 was not submitted for this file.
A.5 Document A.5 was not submitted for this file.
A.6 COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s rebuttal document to the Board of Revision, (Acklands-Granger Inc. Et Al), received May 15, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).
A.7 COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s submission titled “Expert Will Say Statement & Curriculum Vitae” submitted to the Board of Revision, received May 15, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).
C(A)1 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT submitted by the Appellant (F) received April 30, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 57-2019 ONLY).
B.1 COMMON DOCUMENT – Email from Assessment & Valuation to Altus Group dated May 3, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 41, 46, 57, 75, 80, 87, 122, 135, 136, 145, 149, 140, 172, 161, 158, 154, 178)
R.1 COMMON DOCUMENT – submitted by the City Assessor titled “Warehouse & Automotive Response 2019 Assessment”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.2 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 General Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.3 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Expert Witness Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.4 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Notice of Appeal Law and Legislation brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.5 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Response Evidence Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)
R.6 COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “Salient Facts & Field Sheets”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 80, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 115, 118, 122, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 144, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185)
Supplementary Notations
The Chair reminded the parties that they were still under oath from the initial hearing which commenced on May 21, 2019.
At the request of the Respondent, and pursuant to Section 208 of The Cities Act, the Chair ordered that the hearing be recorded by Royal Reporting Services. A Confidentiality Order was noted and signed for Exhibit C(A)1, “Appendix F – Property Summary Report”.
The parties to the appeal agreed that with regard to Grounds 1 to 4, all evidence and argument from appeal BOR 36-2019 would be carried forward into this appeal.
Conclusion
For the reasons given in the Record of Decision dated August 30, 2019, and in accordance with Section 210(1) (b) of The Cities Act, the Board changes the assessment and directs a revision of the assessment roll for the property under appeal. The resultant change in assessment will reflect the revised warehouse stratification (determined in BOR 36-2019) to include (with the exception of the current Group 6) all warehouses under appeal city wide >24,000 sq. ft. and having a site coverage greater than 17%. The new Market Cap Rate arising from this stratification will be applied to the determination of the new assessed value of the subject property.
If, and only if, this Panel’s decision regarding the cap rate does not survive a future appeal, then the subject property’s assessed value will be adjusted in compliance with the Committee’s order in AAC 2017-0299 et al so that the main structure at 2915 Faithfull Avenue is assessed via application of a Cap Rate of 6.59% due to a site coverage calculation (included the costed canopy area) of greater than 26.7%. If this Panel’s cap rate decision survives a further appeal, then the issue regarding site coverage will be redundant and dismissed.
The Current Assessed Value is reduced. The assessment is ADJUSTED and all other aspects of the appeal are dismissed.
The hearings held on July 26, 2019 concluded at 2:32 p.m.
As Secretary to the above Board of Revision Panel, I certify that these are accurate minutes of the hearings held July 26, 2019.
_________________________
|
Joyce Fast, Panel Clerk
|
|