PUBLIC MINUTES

BOARD OF REVISION

Meeting #:
Date:
-
Location:
Council Chamber, City Hall
PRESENT:
  • Mr. A. Deschamps, Chair
  • Ms. J. Bold
  • Mr. C. Choquette
ALSO PRESENT:
  • Ms. J. Fast, Panel Clerk
The appellants were advised that the proceedings were being recorded for the purposes of the Board and the Secretary.  The Chair introduced the Board members and the Secretary and briefly outlined the procedures that would be followed during the course of the hearing.  Those present were also informed that all witnesses, including appellants and the Assessor, would be sworn under oath, or affirm that their statements are true, before their testimony would begin.

Hearings will be heard in the order in which they appear on the scheduled list. 

Appeal No.

Roll No.

Civic Address

 

36-2019

415202500

3602 Millar Ave

 

41-2019

404906700

3835 Thatcher Ave

 

44-2019

405305350

4015 Brodsky Ave

 

46-2019

404907000

110 Marquis Dr

 

47-2019

405105805

311 70th St

 

48-2019

405305100

3924 Brodsky Ave

 

56-2019

435008000

2815 Faithfull Ave

 

57-2019

435007100

2915 Faithfull Ave

 

65-2019

405206000

115 Marquis Crt

 

72-2019

425204000

142 English Cres

 

75-2019

385010400

1327 North Service Rd

 

80-2019

495602940

325 Jessop Ave

 

87-2019

404921050

535 71st St

 

88-2019

414801000

310 Marquis Dr

 

90-2019

425125250

850 56th St

 

91-2019

425124500

875 57th St

 

92-2019

435017710

3066 Faithfull Ave

 

96-2019

405309510

102 4002 Arthur Rose Ave

 

97-2019

405309515

104 4002 Arthur Rose Ave

 

98-2019

405309525

108 4002 Arthur Rose Ave

 

99-2019

405310095

200 4014 Arthur Rose Ave

 

100-2019

405310060

214 4014 Arthur Rose Ave

 

101-2019

405310055

216 4014 Arthur Rose Ave

 

115-2019

414906300

210 Apex St

 

118-2019

425000700

3250 Idylwyld Dr

 

122-2019

475011340

1201 Quebec Ave

 

129-2019

404904000

3935 Thatcher Ave

 

132-2019

415303200

126 Wheeler St

 

134-2019

414913600

3533 Idylwyld Dr

 

135-2019

414918000

3630 Thatcher Ave

 

136-2019

405300700

3927 Wanuskewin Rd

 

137-2019

415103600

820 60th St

 

138-2019

425104350

838 59th St

 

139-2019

405304050

3810 Arthur Rose Ave

 

140-2019

424900500

3455 Idylwyld Dr

 

144-2019

465127810

237 Venture Cres

 

145-2019

415209050

3610 Kochar Ave

 

147-2019

415209450

3620 Kochar Ave

 

149-2019

395050050

1045 North Service Rd

 

154-2019

404910700

122 Wakooma St

 

155-2019

415210200

3720 Kochar Ave

 

156-2019

435200350

30 Molaro Pl

 

158-2019

415122450

745 66th St

 

160-2019

415001510

3540 Idylwyld Dr

 

161-2019

385010200

1125 North Service Rd

 

164-2019

405311540

10 3935 Arthur Rose Ave

 

165-2019

435123300

843 56th St

 

168-2019

425123460

835 57th St

 

169-2019

425007240

3403 Faithfull Ave

 

172-2019

435100380

2945 Millar Ave

 

174-2019

415121400

3603 Millar Ave

 

175-2019

415122200

3703 Millar Ave

 

178-2019

405109110

815 66th St

 

180-2019

415204000

3719 Mitchelmore Ave

 

184-2019

435122780

3018 Miners Ave

 

185-2019

415104500

810 60th St

 

1.2.2   Appeal 139-2019 (lead)

Appeal No.

Roll No.

Civic Address

139-2019 (lead)

405304050

3810 Arthur Rose Ave

48-2019

405305100

3924 Brodsky Ave

132-2019

415303200

126 Wheeler St

Appearing for the Appellant

Mr. Jesse Faith, Altus Group Limited

Appearing for the Respondent

Mr. Travis Horne, Revaluation and Assessment Appeal Coordinator, Assessment & Valuation

Grounds and Issues

The grounds and issues for this appeal as identified in the Notice of Appeal (Exhibit A.1) are as follows:

Ground 1:     The Assessor erred in the calculation of the property assessment when applying the current capitalization rate.

Ground 2:     The Assessor has failed to achieve the market valuation standard.

Ground 3:     The Assessor has failed to maintain equity when determining the current assessment of the subject property.

Ground 4:     The Assessor has failed to apply the findings of SMB decision AAC 2017-0225 in determining the current assessment.

Ground 5:     The estimated net operating income is in error.

Exhibits

A.1     Notice of Appeal from Altus Group to the Board of Revision, received February 4, 2019. 

A.2     COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s submission to the Board of Revision, (Acklands-Granger Inc. Et Al), received April 30, 2019 (Note: Document includes Appendix A to V and Addenda 1 to 5).  (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185). 

A.3     Document A.3 was not submitted for this file. 

A.4     Document A.4 was not submitted for this file. 

A.5     COMMON DOCUMENT – Appellant’s submission to the Board of Revision, (Conax Properties Ltd. Et Al) received April 30, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 139, 48, 132, 164) 

A.6     COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s rebuttal document to the Board of Revision, (Acklands-Granger Inc. Et Al), received May 15, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185). 

A.7     COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s submission titled “Expert Will Say Statement & Curriculum Vitae” submitted to the Board of Revision, received May 15, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185). 

B.1     Document B.1 was not submitted for this file. 

R.1     COMMON DOCUMENT – submitted by the City Assessor titled “Warehouse & Automotive Response 2019 Assessment”, received May 13, 2019.  (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185) 

R.2     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 General Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185) 

R.3     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Expert Witness Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019.  (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185) 

R.4     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Notice of Appeal Law and Legislation brief”, received May 13, 2019.  (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185) 

R.5     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Response Evidence Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185) 

R.6     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “Salient Facts & Field Sheets”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 80, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 115, 118, 122, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 144, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185) 

Supplementary Notations

The Chair reminded the parties that they were still under oath from the initial hearing which commenced on May 21, 2019.

At the request of the Respondent, and pursuant to Section 208 of The Cities Act, the Chair ordered that the hearing be recorded by Royal Reporting Services.

The Agent and the Respondent agreed that Appeal 139-2019 would be heard first and that all evidence and argument from that appeal would be carried forward into appeals 132-2019 and 48-2019.

The Agent and Respondent agreed that the evidence and argument from Appeal 36-2019 be carried forward into the record of this appeal as it pertains to the cap rate ground of appeal.

Conclusion

For the reasons given in the Record of Decision dated August 30, 2019, and in accordance with Section 210(1) (b) of The Cities Act, the Board changes the assessment and directs a revision of the assessment roll for all properties under appeal. The resultant change in assessment will reflect a revised stratification to include (with the exception of the current Group 6) all warehouses under appeal city wide >24,000 sq. ft. and having a site coverage greater than 17%. The new Market Cap Rate arising from this stratification will be applied to the determination of the new assessed value of the subject properties.

The Current Assessed Values are reduced. The assessments are ADJUSTED and all other aspects of the appeals are dismissed. The Appellant’s filing fees are refunded.

1.2.3   Appeal 75-2019 (lead)

Appeal No.

Roll No.

Civic Address

75-2019 (lead)

385010400

1327 North Service Rd

80-2019

495602940

325 Jessop Ave

122-2019

475011340

1201 Quebec Ave

Appearing for the Appellant

Mr. Jesse Faith, Altus Group Limited

Appearing for the Respondent

Mr. Travis Horne, Revaluation and Assessment Appeal Coordinator, Assessment & Valuation

Grounds and Issues

The grounds and issues for this appeal as identified in the Notice of Appeal (Exhibit A.1) are as follows:

  1. The assessor erred in not applying a MAF to the RNCLD lump sum adjustment. 

Exhibits

A.1     Notice of Appeal from Altus Group to the Board of Revision, received February 4, 2019.

A.2     Document A.2 was not submitted for this file.

A.3     Document A.3 was not submitted for this file.

A.4     COMMON DOCUMENT – Appellant’s submission to the Board of Revision (Saskatoon Cooperative Association Et Al), received April 30, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 41, 46, 75, 122, 145, 140, 172, 161, 149, 158, 87, 154).

A.5     Document A.5 was not submitted for this file.

A.6     Document A.6 was not submitted for this file.

A.7     Document A.7 was not submitted for this file.

B.1     COMMON DOCUMENT – Email from Assessment & Valuation to Altus Group dated May 3, 2019.    (FOR USE WITH: 41, 46, 57, 75, 80, 87, 122, 135, 136, 145, 149, 140, 172, 161, 158, 154, 178)

R.1     COMMON DOCUMENT – submitted by the City Assessor titled “Warehouse & Automotive Response 2019 Assessment”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.2     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 General Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.3     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Expert Witness Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.4     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Notice of Appeal Law and Legislation brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.5     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Response Evidence Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.6     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “Salient Facts & Field Sheets”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 80, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 115, 118, 122, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 144, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185)

Supplementary Notations

The Chair reminded the parties that they were still under oath from the initial hearing which commenced on May 21, 2019.

At the request of the Respondent, and pursuant to Section 208 of The Cities Act, the Chair ordered that the hearing be recorded by Royal Reporting Services.

The Tax Agent advised the Panel that he would not speak to Grounds 1 & 2 of Appeal 122-2019.

The parties to the appeal agreed that Appeal No. 75-2019 would be heard first and that all evidence and argument from that appeal would be carried forward into the following appeals:

80-2019, 122-2019.

They further agreed that as per Exhibit B.1:

“The MAF issue is “stand up sit down”. This issue is before the A.A.C. and the evidence and argument in 2019 is the same as previous years.”

Conclusion

For the reasons stated in the Record of Decision dated August 30, 2019, and in accordance with Section 210(1) (a) of The Cities Act, the Board confirms the assessments. The appeals are dismissed.

1.2.4   Appeal 46-2019 (lead)

Appeal No.

Roll No.

Civic Address

46-2019

404907000

110 Marquis Dr

87-2019

404921050

535 71st St

129-2019

404904000

3935 Thatcher Ave

140-2019

424900500

3455 Idylwyld Dr

145-2019

415209050

3610 Kochar Ave

149-2019

395050050

1045 North Service Rd

154-2019

404910700

122 Wakooma St

158-2019

415122450

745 66th St

161-2019

385010200

1125 North Service Rd

172-2019

435100380

2945 Millar Ave

Appearing for the Appellant

Mr. Jesse Faith, Altus Group Limited

Appearing for the Respondent

Mr. Travis Horne, Revaluation and Assessment Appeal Coordinator, Assessment & Valuation

Grounds and Issues

The grounds and issues for this appeal as identified in the Notice of Appeal (Exhibit A.1) are as follows:

  1. The assessor erred in the calculation of the property assessment when applying the current capitalization (CAP) rate.
  2. The assessor has failed to achieve the market valuation standard.
  3. The assessor has failed to maintain equity when determining the current assessment of the subject property.
  4. The assessor has failed to apply the findings of SMB decision AAC 2017-0225 in determining the current assessment.
  5. The assessor has erred in not applying a MAF to the RCNLD lump sum adjustment.

Exhibits

A.1     Notice of Appeal from Altus Group to the Board of Revision, received February 4, 2019.

A.2     COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s submission to the Board of Revision, (Acklands-Granger Inc. Et Al), received April 30, 2019 (Note: Document includes Appendix A to V and Addenda 1 to 5). (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).

A.3     Document A.3 was not submitted for this file.

A.4     COMMON DOCUMENT – Appellant’s submission to the Board of Revision (Saskatoon Cooperative Association et al), received April 30, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 41, 46, 75, 87, 122, 140, 145, 149, 154, 158, 161, 172).

A.5     Document A.5 was not submitted for this file.

A.6     COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s rebuttal document to the Board of Revision, (Acklands-Granger Inc. Et Al), received May 15, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129,132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).

A.7     COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s submission titled “Expert Will Say Statement & Curriculum Vitae” submitted to the Board of Revision, received May 15, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).

B.1     COMMON DOCUMENT – Email from Assessment & Valuation to Altus Group dated May 3, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 41, 46, 57, 75, 80, 87,122, 135, 136, 140, 145, 149, 154, 158, 161, 172, 178).

R.1     COMMON DOCUMENT – submitted by the City Assessor titled “Warehouse & Automotive Response 2019 Assessment”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.2     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 General Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019.  (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.3     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Expert Witness Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019.     (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.4     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Notice of Appeal Law and Legislation brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.5     COMMON DOCUMENT – submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Response Evidence Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019.     (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.6     COMMON DOCUMENT – submitted by the City Assessor titled “Salient Facts & Field Sheets”, received May 1, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 80, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 115, 118, 122, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 144, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).

Supplementary Notations

The Chair reminded the parties that they were still under oath from the initial hearing which commenced on May 21, 2019.

At the request of the Respondent, and pursuant to Section 208 of The Cities Act, the Chair ordered that the hearing be recorded by Royal Reporting Services.

The parties to the appeal agreed that:

  • Grounds 1 to 4 (Section 2) would be addressed by bringing forward the record of BOR 36-2019 into this appeal; and
  • Ground 5 (Section 2) would be addressed by bringing forward the record of BOR 75-2019 into this appeal.
  • No additional testimony would be provided by either party.

Conclusion

For the reasons given in the Record of Decision dated August 30, 2019, and in accordance with Section 210(1) (b) of The Cities Act, the Board changes the assessment and directs a revision of the assessment roll for all properties under appeal. The resultant change in assessment will reflect a revised stratification to include (with the exception of the current Group 6) all warehouses under appeal city wide >24,000 sq. ft. and having a site coverage greater than 17%. The new Market Cap Rate arising from this stratification will be applied to the determination of the new assessed value of the subject properties.

The Current Assessed Values are reduced. The assessments are ADJUSTED and all other aspects of the appeals are dismissed. The Appellant’s filing fees are refunded.

1.2.5   Appeal 100-2019 (lead)

Appeal No.

Roll No.

Civic Address

100-2019

405310060

214 4014 Arthur Rose Ave

044-2019

405305350

4015 Brodsky Ave

096-2019

405309510

102 4002 Arthur Rose Ave

097-2019

405309515

104 4002 Arthur Rose Ave

098-2019

405309525

108 4002 Arthur Rose Ave

099-2019

405310095

200 4014 Arthur Rose Ave

101-2019

405310055

216 4014 Arthur Rose Ave

164-2019

405311540

10 3935 Arthur Rose Ave

 

Appearing for the Appellant

Mr. Jesse Faith, Altus Group Limited

Appearing for the Respondent

Mr. Travis Horne, Revaluation and Assessment Appeal Coordinator, Assessment & Valuation

Grounds and Issues

Ground 1:     The estimated net operating income is in error

a) The current model rental rate is not reflective of the market value.

b) The current rental rate does not account for the impact due to the restrictive zoning associated with the property.

Exhibits

A.1     Notice of Appeal from Altus Group to the Board of Revision, received February 4, 2019.

A.2     COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s submission to the Board of Revision, (Acklands-Granger Inc. Et Al), received April 30, 2019 (Note: Document includes Appendix A to V and Addenda 1 to 5). (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).

A.3     Document A.3 was not submitted for this file.

A.4     Document A.4 was not submitted for this file.

A.5     COMMON DOCUMENT – Appellant’s submission to the Board of Revision, (Conax Properties Ltd. Et Al) received April 30, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 139, 48, 132, 164)

A.6     COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s rebuttal document to the Board of Revision, (Acklands-Granger Inc. Et Al), received May 15, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).

A.7     COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s submission titled “Expert Will Say Statement & Curriculum Vitae” submitted to the Board of Revision, received May 15, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).

B.1     Document B.1 was not submitted for this file.

R.1     COMMON DOCUMENT – submitted by the City Assessor titled “Warehouse & Automotive Response 2019 Assessment”, received May 13, 2019.  (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.2     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 General Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.3     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Expert Witness Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.4     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Notice of Appeal Law and Legislation brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.5     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Response Evidence Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.6     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “Salient Facts & Field Sheets”, received May 13, 2019.  (FOR USE WITH: 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 80, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 115, 118, 122, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 144, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185)

Supplementary Notations

The Chair reminded the parties that they were still under oath from the initial hearing which commenced on May 21, 2019.

At the request of the Respondent, and pursuant to Section 208 of The Cities Act, the Chair ordered that the hearing be recorded by Royal Reporting Services.

The Agent and the Respondent agreed that Appeal 139-2019 would be heard first and that all evidence and argument pertaining to the zoning ground, would be carried forward into appeals 100-2019, 101-2019, 164-2019, 44-2019, 96-2019, 97-2019, 98-2019, and 99-2019.

Conclusion

For the reasons given in the Record of Decision dated August 30, 2019, and in accordance with Section 210(1)(a) of The Cities Act, the Board confirms the assessments. The appeals are dismissed.

1.2.6   Appeal 136-2019 

Appeal No.

Roll No.

Civic Address

136-2019

405300700

3927 Wanuskewin Road

 

Appearing for the Appellant

Mr. Jesse Faith, Altus Group Limited

Appearing for the Respondent

Mr. Travis Horne, Revaluation and Assessment Appeal Coordinator,         Assessment & Valuation

Grounds and Issues

The grounds and issues for this appeal as identified in the Notice of Appeal (Exhibit A.1) are as follows: 

  1. The assessor erred in the calculation of the property assessment when applying the current capitalization (CAP) rate.
  2. The assessor has failed to achieve the market valuation standard.
  3. The assessor has failed to maintain equity when determining the current assessment of the subject property.
  4. The assessor has failed to apply the findings of SMB decision AAC 2017-0225 in determining the current assessment.
  5. The estimated net operating income is in error.

Exhibits

A.1     Notice of Appeal from Altus Group to the Board of Revision, received February 4, 2019.

A.2     Document A.2 was not submitted for this file.

A.3     Document A.3 was not submitted for this file.

A.4     Document A.4 was not submitted for this file.

A.5     Document A.5 was not submitted for this file.

A.6     Document A.6 was not submitted for this file.

A.7     Document A.7 was not submitted for this file.

B.1     COMMON DOCUMENT – Email from Assessment & Valuation to Altus Group dated May 3, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 41, 46, 57, 75, 80, 87, 122, 135, 136, 145, 149, 140, 172, 161, 158, 154, 178)

R.1     COMMON DOCUMENT – submitted by the City Assessor titled “Warehouse & Automotive Response 2019 Assessment”, received May 13, 2019.  (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.2     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 General Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019.  (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.3     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Expert Witness Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019.   (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 8, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.4     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Notice of Appeal Law and Legislation brief”, received May 13, 2019.  (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.5     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Response Evidence Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019.   (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.6     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “Salient Facts & Field Sheets”, received May 13, 2019.   (FOR USE WITH: 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 80, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 115, 118, 122, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 144, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185)

Supplementary Notations

The Chair reminded the parties that they were still under oath from the initial hearing which commenced on May 21, 2019.

At the request of the Respondent, and pursuant to Section 208 of The Cities Act, the Chair ordered that the hearing be recorded by Royal Reporting Services.

The parties to the appeal agreed that:

  • With regard to Grounds 1 to 4, all evidence and argument from appeal BOR 36-2019 would be carried forward into this appeal.
  • With regard to Ground 5, the Panel would take direction from the outcome of appeal BOR 13&14-2019 in which the same ground was appealed for the subject property, but through a different Tax Agent. (subject property’s appeal being 13-2019)

Conclusion

For the reasons given in the Record of Decision dated August 30, 2019, and in accordance with Section 210(1) (b) of The Cities Act, the Board changes the assessment and directs a revision of the assessment roll for the property under appeal. The resultant change in assessment will reflect the revised warehouse stratification (determined in BOR 36-2019) to include (with the exception of the current Group 6) all warehouses under appeal city wide >24,000 sq. ft. and having a site coverage greater than 17%. The new Market Cap Rate arising from this stratification will be applied to the determination of the new assessed value of the subject property.

Additionally, the subject property’s assessed value will be further adjusted in compliance with the Board’s order in BOR 13-2019 regarding a rental rate reduction of 18%.

The Current Assessed Value is reduced. The assessment is adjusted and all other aspects of the appeal dismissed.

 1.2.7   Appeal 057-2019 

Appeal No.

Roll No.

Civic Address

057-2019

435007100

2907/2915 Faithfull Avenue

 

Appearing for the Appellant

Mr. Jesse Faith, Altus Group Limited

Appearing for the Respondent

Mr. Travis Horne, Revaluation and Assessment Appeal Coordinator,        Assessment & Valuation

Grounds and Issues

The grounds and issues for this appeal as identified in the Notice of Appeal (Exhibit A.1) are as follows: 

  1. The assessor erred in the calculation of the property assessment when applying the current capitalization (CAP) rate.
  2. The assessor has failed to achieve the market valuation standard.
  3. The assessor has failed to maintain equity when determining the current assessment of the subject property.
  4. The assessor has failed to apply the findings of SMB decision AAC 2017-0225 in determining the current assessment.
  5. The estimated net operating income is in error.

Exhibits

A.1     Notice of Appeal from Altus Group to the Board of Revision, received February 4, 2019.

A.2     COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s submission to the Board of Revision, (Acklands-Granger Inc. Et Al), received April 30, 2019 (Note: Document includes Appendix A to V and Addenda 1 to 5). (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).

A.3     Appellant’s submission to the Board of Revision, (Concorde Group of Companies), received April 30, 2019. (exclusive to 57-2019)

A.4     Document A.4 was not submitted for this file.

A.5     Document A.5 was not submitted for this file.

A.6     COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s rebuttal document to the Board of Revision, (Acklands-Granger Inc. Et Al), received May 15, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).

A.7     COMMON DOCUMENT - Appellant’s submission titled “Expert Will Say Statement & Curriculum Vitae” submitted to the Board of Revision, received May 15, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 137, 138, ,139, 140, 145,146,147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185).

C(A)1 CONFIDENTIAL DOCUMENT submitted by the Appellant (F) received April 30, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 57-2019 ONLY).

B.1     COMMON DOCUMENT – Email from Assessment & Valuation to Altus Group dated May 3, 2019 (FOR USE WITH: 41, 46, 57, 75, 80, 87, 122, 135, 136, 145, 149, 140, 172, 161, 158, 154, 178)

R.1     COMMON DOCUMENT – submitted by the City Assessor titled “Warehouse & Automotive Response 2019 Assessment”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.2     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 General Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019.  (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.3     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Expert Witness Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019   (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.4     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Notice of Appeal Law and Legislation brief”, received May 13, 2019. (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.5     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “2019 Response Evidence Law and Legislation Brief”, received May 13, 2019.   (FOR USE WITH: 36, 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 115, 118, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 163, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 181, 184, 185)

R.6     COMMON DOCUMENT –submitted by the City Assessor titled “Salient Facts & Field Sheets”, received May 13, 2019.   (FOR USE WITH: 41, 44, 46, 47, 48, 56, 57, 65, 72, 75, 80, 87, 88, 90, 91, 92, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 115, 118, 122, 129, 132, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139, 140, 144, 145, 147, 149, 154, 155, 156, 158, 160, 161, 164, 165, 168, 169, 172, 174, 175, 178, 180, 184, 185)

Supplementary Notations

The Chair reminded the parties that they were still under oath from the initial hearing which commenced on May 21, 2019.

At the request of the Respondent, and pursuant to Section 208 of The Cities Act, the Chair ordered that the hearing be recorded by Royal Reporting Services.   A Confidentiality Order was noted and signed for Exhibit C(A)1, “Appendix F – Property Summary Report”.

The parties to the appeal agreed that with regard to Grounds 1 to 4, all evidence and argument from appeal BOR 36-2019 would be carried forward into this appeal.

Conclusion

For the reasons given in the Record of Decision dated August 30, 2019, and in accordance with Section 210(1) (b) of The Cities Act, the Board changes the assessment and directs a revision of the assessment roll for the property under appeal. The resultant change in assessment will reflect the revised warehouse stratification (determined in BOR 36-2019) to include (with the exception of the current Group 6) all warehouses under appeal city wide >24,000 sq. ft. and having a site coverage greater than 17%. The new Market Cap Rate arising from this stratification will be applied to the determination of the new assessed value of the subject property.

If, and only if, this Panel’s decision regarding the cap rate does not survive a future appeal, then the subject property’s assessed value will be adjusted in compliance with the Committee’s order in AAC 2017-0299 et al so that the main structure at 2915 Faithfull Avenue is assessed via application of a Cap Rate of 6.59% due to a site coverage calculation (included the costed canopy area) of greater than 26.7%. If this Panel’s cap rate decision survives a further appeal, then the issue regarding site coverage will be redundant and dismissed.

The Current Assessed Value is reduced. The assessment is ADJUSTED and all other aspects of the appeal are dismissed.

The hearings held on July 26, 2019 concluded at 2:32 p.m.

As Secretary to the above Board of Revision Panel, I certify that these are accurate minutes of the hearings held July 26, 2019.

 

_________________________

Joyce Fast, Panel Clerk